Signs of the Apocalypse, or, Is Judo Really Dying?

By Joshua Hagen

The coming apocalypse and the prophecy of an imminent death blow looming over our sport has forever been a topic of conversation in the judo community, going back as far as I can remember. Judo people are are such an incredibly passionate group that we’re all frustrated at the lack of accolades or major media covering the sport.  We love judo so deeply, and it’s in fact such a big part of who we are, that we’re convinced that at any moment the ride could be over.  We fear the day will come when judo is no longer an Olympic sport, causing membership at clubs to quickly dry up, and putting an end to judo tournaments the world over.  Call me an optimist, but I truly believe judo is actually healthier than ever.

By now the whole judo community is aware of the double hansoku-make (disqualification) that occured over the past weekend at the Düsseldorf Grand Slam.  To say there has been an outpouring of commentary would be an understatement, which is not a surprise to me, since none of us saw handing out 2 silver medals at a grand slam coming.  In case you’re in the 1% of the judo community that has not seen this match, I’ve attached the video below.  


The part that does surprise me, however,  is what is being said about the match.  Whether it’s because we dislike authority, or are not fans of all of the recent rule changes and are letting our imaginations run amok, the commentary ranges from surprising to outrageous.  Maybe people are just writing from a place of frustration, because of how embarrassed they are for judo in general after having watched the match.  I have read multiple times: “the IJF needs to bring back being able to rip a grip with two hands”, which makes me question whether these people have actually watched the match.  

Does anyone really think that allowing these athletes to rip the grips off with two hands, could actually have improved this match?  Let’s be honest. The match was absolutely ugly.  In just under 2 minutes of match time, there is not one actual attempt to throw or even break posture by either player.  If we allowed leg grabs, or more defensive ripping of grips, or if we still had yukos, none of it was going to save this match from being terrible. So where does the blame really lie?

I don’t agree with all of the recent rule changes in judo, but no matter what decade this double hansoku-make-double-silver match happened in, nobody wanted to watch it.  I’m sure the fighters themselves are embarrassed about that performance, and rightfully so.  I would guess that the Japanese federation is pretty embarrassed to have had two of their fighters represent themselves in this way in a Grand Slam Final.  I’m certain that the IJF is embarrassed, because this is the very type of thing that they’re trying to avoid.  So what could have been done differently to avoid all of the embarrassment?  Let the match go on another 5 minutes in that way?  They had both been penalized twice already, and neither remotely changed their strategy, if what they were doing can be called “strategy”.

One thing I’m pretty sure of is that the rule changes everyone loves to hate are surely not to blame for that brutal match and its fallout.  There was some spectacular judo happening at Düsseldorf on the weekend.  Did anyone see Fonseca from Portugal?  That guy is like a human highlight reel, and threw some of the most massive ippons I can remember recently. Dusseldorf also saw the return of Shohei Ono, who just continues to dominate whenever he decides to compete.


So while there are clearly some rules that need to be ironed out, maybe this double hansoku-make will turn out to be a shot across the bow.  Fighters stalling and standing around and not attempting any techniques will kill our sport faster than any minor rule changes ever will.

Please check out my last blog on building a high performance program


 If you're enjoying my work, please consider making a monthly or one-time donation to help me continue to create the content that you love. Thanks!


Josh Hagen

Jason please read my blog on why there are no longer leg grabs in judo to better understand the reasoning behind it.


I think that if two fighters decide not to attack the rules become irrespective as was demonstrated as they were both disqualified and knew that would be the case.
The rule changes are detrimental to the sport, the removal of defence the removal from of techniques that devalues judo, chasing the money is what’s going on, judo became widely practiced and lived with these techniques included we will not compete with the likes of bjj when we dilute the sport to try and make it look pretty.


We all understand the rule changes are so the TV public can understand better and I agree with helpping people understand
But the sport is being diluted to much
How do you grow champions when you change the rules so much how many rule changes in cycling and rowing athletics not half as much as judo

With being in the sport for over 40yrs i have never felt like it’s to much change for the worse
The wazari rule ok now you will get player being knocked down for 2 wazaris and not really try for ippon
Little knock over is a wazari where do you start

Look at other fighting sports it’s a strike to a place on the body a point it given not a throw arm lock hold down

If the governing body was listening to the people who pay week in and out in bold sweat and tears and not the arm chair fans than we woukd not be in such a decline

Just give the judoka who do the sport a vote and have a word with rule changes

So many wish for pick ups and grip braking leg grabs to be back

Let’s vote and then see what happens

One truly devoted judo fan

Whats wrong with pick ups and breaking grips with two hands as you said it wouldn’t of changed the result but will open up the fight for better throws that’s have been taken out

To much dilutioed

Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published